Intersectionality in action: Reflections on decolonizing research practice in the context of care(ing) and age(ing)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Building on interviews and reflections, this article combines an exploration of the intersection of care(ing) and age(ing) in communities experiencing rapid diversification and population ageing, and an examination of the research endeavor from intersectional and decolonizing perspectives. Poking holes in conventional research practices provides opportunities for rewriting dominant deficit-based narratives about care(ing) and age(ing) that contribute to gaps in service provision. Adopting alternative ways to developing new knowledge provides pathways to improve well-being among all those involved in care partnerships. The authors argue that positioning the experiences of carers and older adults at the fore of gerontology practice and research is essential to decolonized knowledge production and dissemination. However, in critically examining their own processes, they discovered shortcomings in their research practices that reveal the long reach of colonized methods. In personal reflections, the authors comment on their attempts to put intersectionality into action as decolonized gerontology research.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
Bhambra, G. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies 17: 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2014.966414
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles 59: 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/ 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Butler, R. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist 9(4): 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.4
Calasanti, T. & King, N. (2015). Intersectionality and age. In J. Twigg & W. Martin (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Cultural Gerontology (pp. 193–200). Oxfordshire: Routledge Publishing.
Chalmers, J. (2017). The transformation of academic knowledges: Understanding the relationship between decolonizing and indigenous research methodologies. SocialistStudies/Etudes Socialistes 12: 97–116. https://doi.org/10.18740/S4GH0C
Chaouni, S. B., Claeys, A., van den Broeke, J. & De Donder, L. (2021). Doing research on the intersection of ethnicity and old age: Key insights from decolonial frameworks. Journal of Aging Studies 56: 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100909
Chazan, M. (2020). Unsettling aging futures: Challenging colonial-normativity in social gerontology. International Journal of Aging and Later Life 14(1): 91–119. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal1652-8670.19454
Collins, P. (2012). Social inequality, power, and politics: Intersectionality and American pragmatism in dialog. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26: 442–457. https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.26.2.0442
Crampton, A. (2022). Decolonizing gerontology through inside-out research and practice. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA. Available on https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4385046 (Accessed: June 22, 2025).
Datta, R. (2018). Decolonizing both researcher and research and its effectiveness in Indigenous research. Research Ethics 14: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117733296
Denscombe, M. (2025). Decolonial research methodology: An assessment of the challenge to established practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 28(2): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2024.2357558
Dore, I. (2018). Social work on the edge: Not knowing, singularity and acceptance. European Journal of Social Work 23: 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1463971
Fadil, N. (2019). It’s not possible for me to be objective: On decolonization in Social Sciences. Available on http://www.dewereldmorgen.be/artikel/2019/04/10/over-de-dekolonisatie-van-de-sociale-wetenschappen-%c2%93it-is-not-possible-for-me-to-be-obejective%c2%94/ (Accessed: October 28, 2024)
Gani, J. & Khan, R. (2024). Positionality statements as a function of coloniality: Interrogating reflexive methodologies. International Studies Quarterly 68(2): sqae038. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae038
Gilmour, J. & Branelly, T. (2010). Representations of people with dementia – subaltern, person, citizen. Nursing Inquiry 17: 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00475x
Gove, D., Georges, J., Rauf, M., van de Broeke, J., Jongsma, J., Claeys, A., Berdai Chaouni, S., Hellstrom, I., Tromp, K., Porteri, C. & Watchman, K. (2019). Overcoming Ethical Challenges Affecting the Involvement of People with Dementia in Research: Recognising Diversity and Promoting Inclusive Research. Dementia in Europe Ethics Report. Senningerberg: Alzheimer Europe.
Griffiths, M. (2016). From heterogeneous worlds: Western privilege and positionality in the South. Area 49(1): 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12277
Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in Westernized universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epsitemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self Knowledge 11: 73–90. Available on http://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol11/iss1/8 (Accessed: June 22, 2025).
McGovern, J., Hellstrom, I. & Oyebode, J. (2024). Ecological theory in the context of super-diversity and globalized ageing. Urban Social Work 8(1): USW-2023-0015.R1. https://doi.org/10.1891/USW-2023-0015
Mignolo, W. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture and Society 26(7–8): 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
Naidu, T. (2024). Epistemic disobedience – Undoing coloniality in global health research. PLoS Global Public Health 4(4): e0003033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003033
Naidu, T., Gingell, G. & Zaidi, Z. (2024). Global Health Promotion 31(2): 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759241238016
Olukotun, O., Mkandawire, E., Antilla, J., Alfaifa, F., Weitzel, J., Scheer, V., Olukotun, M. & Mkandawire- Valhmu, D. (2021). An analysis of reflections on researcher positionality. The Qualitative Report 26(5): 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4613
Padgett, D. & Henwood, B. (2009). Obtaining large-scale funding for empowerment research: A report from personal experience. Qualitative Health Research 19(6): 868–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308327815
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South 1: 553–580.
Sims, D. (2023). Reimagining reflexivity through a critical theoretical framework: Autoethnographic narratives on becoming a (de)colonized researcher. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning 11(1): 642. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v11i1.642
Smith-Morris, C., Rodriguez, S., Soto, R., Spencer, M. & Meneghini, L. (2021). Decolonizing care at diagnosis: Culture, history, and family at an urban inter-tribal clinic. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 35(3): 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12645
Tarisayi, K. S. (2023). Autoethnography as a qualitative methodology: Conceptual foundations, techniques, benefits and limitations. Encyclopaideia 27(67): 53–63. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/17815
Thambinathan, V. & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20(1): 160940692110147. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
Walters, K. & Auton-Cuff, F. (2009). A story to tell: The identity development of women growing up as third culture kids. Mental Health, Religion and Culture 12: 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670903029153
White, E. & Davis, M. (2023). Exploring subjectivity: A critique of reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Review Letter 1: 96–103. Available on https://qrrletter.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/13 (Accessed: June 22, 2025).
Zembylas, M. (2025). Bringing intersectionality ad (de)coloniality into dialogue: Theoretical insights and political pathways for decolonizing higher education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open 12: 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssah.2025.101772
Zubair, M. & Victor, C. (2015). Exploring gender, age, time and space in research with older Pakistani Muslims in the United Kingdom: Formalised research “ethics” and performances of the public/private divide in “the field.” Ageing & Society 35: 961–985. https://doi.org/10.1017/So144686X14001030