Older adults and information and communication technologies: a qualitative interview study on basic psychological needs
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, we investigated older adults’ experiences and views of using information and communication technology (ICT) from the perspective of the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. We collected data from thematic interviews with Finnish older adults aged 57–96 (N = 19). We analyzed the data using theory-driven content analysis, for which self-determination theory provided a theoretical framework and guided the analysis. Our analysis revealed various uses of technologies and several ways that older adults’ experiences and views of using ICT reflected the experiences of the basic psychological needs. The results suggest that the basic psychological needs can guide what kind of technology is adopted or not adopted, how, and why. Furthermore, use of ICT can enable and hinder the meeting of the basic psychological needs. The results underline the fact that future ICT should be developed in a way that respects the basic psychological needs.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G. & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of Business Research 136: 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.011
Ball, C., Francis, J., Huang, K. T., Kadylak, T., Cotten, S. R. & Rikard, R. V. (2019). The physical–digital divide: Exploring the social gap between digital natives and physical natives. Journal of Applied Gerontology 38(8): 1167–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817732518
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3): 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open 2: 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.npls.2016.01.001
Birkland, J. (2019). Gerontechnology: Understanding Older Adult Information and Communication Technology Use. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
Calvo, R. A., Peters, D., Vold, K. & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Supporting human autonomy in AI systems: A framework for ethical enquiry. In C. Burr & L. Floridi (eds.), Ethics of Digital Well-Being (pp. 31–54). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_2
Choolayil, A. & Putran, L. (2022). Transcending borders and stereotypes: Older parents’ intergenerational contacts and social networking through digital platforms. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 15(2): 127–153. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3504
Clark, R. & Moloney, G. (2020). Facebook and older adults: Fulfilling psychological needs? Journal of Aging Studies 55: 100897. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100897
Cotten, S. R., Schuster, A. M. & Seifert, A. (2022). Social media use and well-being among older adults. Current Opinion in Psychology 45: 101293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.005
de Charms, R. (1968). Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18(1): 105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Co.
Deci, E. L., Spiegel, N. H., Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R. & Kauffman, M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: Behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology 74(6): 852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852
Dupuy, L., Consel, C. & Sauzéon, H. (2016). Self determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 65: 508–521. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.042
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(1): 107–115. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fang, Y., Chau, A. K., Wong, A., Fung, H. H. & Woo, J. (2018). Information and communicative technology use enhances psychological well-being of older adults: The roles of age, social connectedness, and frailty status. Aging & Mental Health 22(11): 1516–1524. https://doi.org /10.1080/13607863.2017.1358354
Ferrand, C. & Martinent, G. (2021). Need frustration and depressive symptoms in French older people: Using a self-determination approach. Aging & Mental Health 25(6): 1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/136 07863.2020.1758912
Ferrand, C., Martinent, G. & Durmaz, N. (2014). Psychological need satisfaction and well-being in adults aged 80 years and older living in residential homes: Using a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Aging Studies 30: 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jaging.2014.04.004
Forsman, A. K. & Nordmyr, J. (2017). Psychosocial links between internet use and mental health in later life: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Journal of Applied Gerontology 36(12): 1471–1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815595509
Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L. & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion–technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies 59: 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
Gallistl, V. & Wanka, A. (2022). The internet multiple: How internet practices are valued in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 15(2): 103–126. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3563
Keenan, J., Rahman, R. & Hudson, J. (2021). Exploring the acceptance of telehealth within palliative care: A self-determination theory perspective. Health and Technology 11(3): 575–584. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12553-021-00535-9
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Latikka, R., Rubio-Hernández, R., Lohan, E. S., Rantala, J., Nieto Fernández, F., Laitinen, A. & Oksanen, A. (2021). Older adults’ loneliness, social isolation, and physical information and communication technology in the era of ambient assisted living: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(12): e28022. https://doi. org/10.2196/28022
Martin, A. A., Horn, A. B. & Allemand, M. (2021). Within-person associations between attachment security, need satisfaction and psychological adjustment in daily life of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 76(1): 56–66. https:// doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz148
Ministry of Finance. (2022). Government Report: Finland’s Digital Compass. Helsinki: Finnish Government.
Näsi, M., Räsänen, P. & Sarpila, O. (2012). ICT activity in later life: Internet use and leisure activities amongst senior citizens in Finland. European Journal of Ageing 9: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10433-011-0210-8
OECD. (2020). Digital Transformation in the Age of COVID-19: Building Resilience and Bridging Divides. Digital Economy Outlook 2020 Supplement. OECD. Available on https://web-archive.oecd.org/2020-11-27/571878- digital-economy-outlook-covid.pdf (Accessed: June 10, 2025).
Peters, D., Calvo, R. A. & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00797
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publishing.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In A. J. Elliot (ed.), Advances in Motivation Science (Vol. 6, pp. 111–156). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M. & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science 7(2): 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A. & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics 34(8): 1607–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
Simons, M., Reijnders, J., Janssens, M., Lataster, J. & Jacobs, N. (2023). Staying connected in old age: Associations between bonding social capital, loneliness and well-being and the value of digital media. Aging & Mental Health 27(1): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022. 2036947
Statistics of Finland. (2021). E-Commerce at a Turning Point. Available on https://stat.fi/til/sutivi/2021/sutivi_2021_2021-11-30_tie_001_ en.html (Accessed: June 10, 2025).
Ten Bruggencate, T., Luijkx, K. G. & Sturm, J. (2019). When your world gets smaller: How older people try to meet their social needs, including the role of social technology. Ageing & Society 39(8): 1826–1852. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000260
United Nations. (2021). Digital Economy Report 2021. Cross-Border Data Flows and Development: For Whom the Data Flow. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations Publications. Available on https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ der2021_en.pdf (Accessed: June 10, 2025).
Van Deursen, A. J. & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale & A. Williams (eds.), Communication and Information Technologies Annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
Van Deursen, A. J. & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society 16(3): 507–526. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444813487959
Van Deursen, A. J. & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society 21(2): 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Van Dijk, J. A. (2020). The Digital Divide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Vansteenkiste, M. & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 23(3): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M. & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion 44(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11031-019-09818-1
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review 66(5): 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
Wilson, C. (2018). Is it love or loneliness? Exploring the impact of everyday digital technology use on the wellbeing of older adults. Ageing & Society 38(7): 1307–1331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16001537a