Exploring co-research interviews with older adults: reflections on research practices and building connections
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Previous research has not only shown the potential of co-research with older adults but also pointed out the need for further study, for example on evaluation and how connections are forged between participants. To this end, this paper (1) describes and reflects on the development and implementation of a co-research interview methodology in the NGO sector and (2) analyses the experiences of the participants and the role of shared age group and locality. The results show that the structure of having several interviews and training and reflection sessions was the strength of the method. The co-researchers found the project interesting and even empowering. Expressions of shared age group and local knowledge were common in the interviews and helped build connections. The interviewees
valued their participation in knowledge-production on issues related to ageing. Recruitment, resourcing and support for co-researchers when faced with difficult situations are some of the themes that require further attention.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
Barnes, M., Taylor, D. & Ward, L. (2013). Being well enough in old age. Critical Social Policy 33(3): 473–493. doi: 10.1177/0261018312471163
Biggs, S. & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Generational Intelligence: A Critical Ap¬proach to Age Relations. London: Routledge.
Bindels, J., Baur, V., Cox, K., Heijing, S. & Abma, T. (2014). Older people as co-researchers: A collaborative journey. Ageing and Society 34(6): 951– 973. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X12001298
Blair, T. & Minkler, M. (2009). Participatory action research with older adults: Key principles in practice. The Gerontologist 49(5): 651–662. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp049
Buffel, T. (2018). Social research and co-production with older people: De¬veloping age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Studies 44: 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.012
Buffel, T. (2019). Older coresearchers exploring age-friendly commu¬nities: An “Insider” perspective on the benefits and challenges of peer-research. The Gerontologist 59(3), 538–548. doi: 10.1093/geront/ gnx216
Coburn, A. & Gormally, S. (2017). Critical reflexivity. Counterpoints 483: 111–126. Available on http://www.jstor.org/stable/45177774 [Accessed March 1, 2021].
Cordier, R., Milbourn, B., Martin, R., Buchanan, A., Chung, D. & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion. PLoS One 12(6): e0179109. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0179109
Corrado, A. M., Benjamin-Thomas, T. E., McGrath, C., Hand, C. & Lal¬iberte Rudman, D. (2020). Participatory action research with older adults: A critical interpretive synthesis. The Gerontologist 60: e413–e427. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz080
De Donder, L., De Witte, N., Verté, D., Dury, S., Buffel, T., Smetcoren, A.S., Brosens, D & Verté, E. (2014). Developing evidence-based age-friendly policies: A participatory research project. In SAGE Research Methods Cases (pp. 1–14). London: Sage Publications.
Dewar, B. (2005) Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research – A framework for future development and understanding. Journal of Clin¬ical Nursing 14: 48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01162.x
European Social Network. (2017). Co-production: a powerful approach to social services design. European Social Network, News. Available on https://www. esn-eu.org/news/co-production-powerful-approach-social-services-de¬sign [Accessed January 21, 2021].
Franits, L. (2005). The issue is—Nothing about us without us: Searching for the narrative of disability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 59: 577–79. doi: 10.5014/ajot.59.5.577
James, H. & Buffel, T. (2022). Co-research with older people: A sys¬tematic literature review. Ageing and Society, 1–27. doi: 10.1017/ S0144686X21002014
Holstein, J. & Gubrium, J. (1995). The Active Interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hoppania, H.-K., Vilkko, A. & Topo, P. (2020) “Jos mä sit kerran tulen.” Elämänote-ohjelman osallisuustutkimuksen tuloksia, osa 1/2 [“Well if I Come Just Once” – Results of the Social Inclusion Research of the Grip of Life Program, Part 1/2]. Ikäinstituutti/Age Institute. available on https://www.ika-instituutti.fi/tuote/jos-ma-sit-kerran-tulen-elamanote-ohjelman-osal¬lisuustutkimuksen-tuloksia-osa-1-2/ [Accessed May 10, 2022].
Hoppania, H.-K., Vilkko, A., & Topo, P. (2021). “Se on mukavampi yh¬dessä tehdä.” Elämänote-ohjelman osallisuustutkimuksen tuloksia, osa 2/2 [“It’s Nicer Together” – Results of the Social Inclusion Research of the Grip of Life Program, Part 2/2]. Ikäinstituutti/Age Institute, available on https://www.ikainstituutti.fi/content/uploads/2021/09/Elaman¬ote-2_172x245_7_VALMIS.pdf [Accessed May 10, 2022].
Hyvärinen, M. & Löyttyniemi, V. (2005). Kerronnallinen haastattelu. In J. Ruusuvuori & L. Tiittula (eds.), Haastattelu. Tutkimus, tilanteet ja vuor¬ovaikutus (pp. 189–222). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Isola, A. M., Kaartinen, H., Leemann, L., Lääperi, R., Schneider, T., Valtari, S. & Keto-Tokoi, A. (2017). Mitä Osallisuus on? Osallisuuden viitekehystä raken¬tamassa. National Institute of Health and Welfare. Available on: https:// www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/135356 [Aaccessed January 21, 2021].
Littlechild, R., Tanner, D. & Hall, K. (2015). Co-research with older peo¬ple: Perspectives on impact. Qualitative Social Work 14(1): 18–35. doi: 10.1177/1473325014556791
Leemann, L., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., Härkänen, T. & Isola, A.M. (2021). Development and psychometric evaluation of the experiences of social inclusion scale. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 23(3): 400–424. doi: 10.1080/1945282
Mey, E. & Van Hoven, B. (2019). Managing expectations in participa¬tory research involving older people: What’s in it for whom?, Inter¬national Journal of Social Research Methodology 22(3), 323–334. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1563977
Ronzi, S., Orton, L., Pope, D., Valtorta, N. K., & Bruce, N. G. (2018). What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Systematic Reviews 7(1): 26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2
Smyth, J. (2017). Social Inclusion. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Educa¬tion. Available on: https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/ acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-129 [Accessed February 12, 2021].
Tanner, D. (2019). Opening communicative space: What do co-re¬searchers contribute? Qualitative Research 19(3), 292–310. doi: 10.1177/1468794118770076
TENK. (2019). Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019. Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integ¬rity TENK 3/2019. Available on: https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review [Accessed January 5, 202