The internet multiple: How internet practices are valued in later life
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Internet practices of older adults are multifaceted and go beyond a “use” and “non-use” binary. In this article, we suggest a valuation approach towards Internet practices in later life that explores Internet practices not as “use” or “non-use,” but rather asks which forms of Internet practices are valued in later life, and which ones are de-valued. For this valuography, we draw upon different data sources, including interviews with older adults, to explore the multiple “goods” and “bads” through which Internet use in later life gets valued. The findings suggest two registers of value: autonomy and innovation. Valued Internet practices in later life are therefore done by an autonomous, older individual and include innovative technologies. We conclude that a performative, reflexive, and value-oriented understanding of Internet practices sheds light on the “Internet Multiple,” or the many different shapes the Internet takes in older people’s lives that go beyond a “use” and “non-use” binary.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
AAL Joint Programme. (2021). AAL Programme. Available on https:// ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/standards/healthcare/personal-auton¬omy/aal-programme_en.html (Accessed: February 15, 2022).
Bergschöld, J., Neven, L. & Peine, A. (2019). DIY gerontechnology: Circumventing mismatched technologies and bureaucratic procedure by creating care technologies of one’s own. Sociology of Health and Illness 42(2): 232–246. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13012
Campbell, C. (1992). The desire for the new: Its nature and social location as presented in theories of fashion and modern consumption. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (eds.), Consuming Technologies: Media and Infor¬mation in Domestic Spaces (pp. 48–66). London: Routledge.
Chen, K. & Chan, A. H. S. (2011). A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10(1): 1–12. doi: 10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00
Clarke, A. (2007). Grounded theory: Critiques, debates, and situational analysis. In W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social science methodology (pp. 423–442). Washinton: SAGE.
Doganova, L., Giraudeau, M., Helgesson, C. F., Kjellberg, H., Lee, F., Mal¬lard, A. & Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2014). Valuation studies and the critique of valuation. Valuation Studies 2(2): 87–96. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.142287
Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C. F. & Lee, F. (2015). Valuography: Studying the making of values. In I. Dussauge, C. Helgesson & F. Lee (eds.), Value Prac¬tices in the Life Sciences and Medicine (pp. 265–285). Oxford: University Press.
Essen, A. & Östlund, B. (2011). Laggards as innovators? Old users as de¬signers of new services & service systems. International Journal of De¬sign 5(3): 89–98.
Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016). An Exploration of Mobile Telephony Non-use among Older People. In E. Dominguez-Rue & L. Nierling (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives From the Social Sciences (pp. 47–65). Bielefeld: transcript.
Flick, U. (2016). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. Reinbek/ Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Gallistl, V. & Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: A study of older Internet users. Leisure Studies 39(2): 251–265. doi: 10.1080/02614367.2019.1694568
Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L. & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital ex¬clusion - Internet practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies 59, Online first. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
Gitlin, L. N., Parisi, J., Huang, J., Winter, L. & Roth, D. L. (2016). Attach¬ment to life: Psychometric analyses of the Valuation of Life scale and differences among older adults. The Gerontologist 56(3): e21–e31. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv696
Grenz, T. & Pfadenhauer, M. (2017). Kulturen im Wandel: Zur nonlin¬earen Brüchigkeit von Mediatisierungsprozessen. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovi? & M. M. Kruse (eds.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess. Medien • Kultur • Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-16084-5_9
Helgesson, C. F. & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it’s worth: An introduc¬tion to valuation studies. Valuation Studies 1(1): 1–10. doi: 10.3384/ vs.2001-5992.13111
Hennion, A. (2017). From valuation to instauration. Valuation Studies 5(1): 69–81. doi: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.175169
Heuts, F. & Mol, A. (2013). What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in prac¬tice. Valuation Studies 1(2): 125–146. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.1312125
Hogarty, J. (2019). Popular Music and Retro Culture in the Digital Era. Lon¬don: Routledge.
Hunsaker, A. & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society 20(10): 3937–3954. doi: 10.1177/1461444818787348
Ignatow, G. & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society 20(7): 950–966. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519
Ingram, J., Shove, E. & Watson, M. (2007). Products and practices: Selected concepts from science and technology studies and from social theo¬ries of consumption and practice. Design Issues 23: 3–16. doi: 10.1162/ desi.2007.23.2.3
Jopp, D., Rott, C. & Oswald, F. (2008). Valuation of life in old and very old age: The role of sociodemographic, social, and health resources for positive adaptation. The Gerontologist 48(5): 646–658. doi: 10.1093/ geront/48.5.646
Kania-Lundholm, M. (2020). The waves that sweep away: Older Internet non- and seldom-users’ experiences of new technologies and digita¬lization. In A. Kaun, C. Lohmeier & C. Pentzold (eds.), Making Time for Digital Lives: Beyond Chronotopia (pp. 43–62). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies 14(2): 135–152. doi: 10.1016/ S0890-4065(00)80008-0
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on The Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 201–221. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-soc-070308-120022
Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Hoffman, C., Grant, R., Have, T. T. & Kleban, M. H. (1999). Health, valuation of life, and the wish to live. The Gerontolo¬gist 39(4): 406–416. doi: 10.1093/geront/39.4.406
Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Hoffman, C., Kleban, M. H., Ruckdeschel, K. & Winter, L. (2001). Valuation of life: A concept and a scale. Journal of Aging and Health 13(1): 3–31. doi: 10.1177/089826430101300101
Lee, C., Czaja, S., Moxley, J., Sharit, J., Boot, W., Charness, N. & Rogers, W. (2019). Attitudes toward computers across adulthood from 1994 to 2013. The Gerontologist 59(1): 22–33. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny081
Loe, M. (2010). Doing it my way: Old women, technology and wellbeing. Sociol¬ogy of Health & Illness 32(2): 319–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01220.x
Mandel, H. (2018). A second look at the process of occupational feminiza¬tion and pay reduction in occupations. Demography 55(2): 669–690. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0657-8
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Moreira, T. (2016). Science, Technology and the Ageing Society. London: Taylor & Francis.
Müller, C., Hornung, D., Hamm, T. & Wulf, V. (2015). Measures and tools for supporting ICT appropriation by elderly and non tech-savvy persons in a long-term perspective. In N. Boulus-Rødje, G. Ellingsen, T. Bratteteig, M. Aanestad & P. Bjørn (eds.), ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 263–281). Oslo: Springer, Cham.
Neven, L. & Peine, A. (2017). From triple win to triple sin: How a problem¬atic future discourse is shaping the way people age with technology. Societies 7(3): 26. doi: 10.3390/soc7030026
Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., Van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R. & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of tech¬nology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 83(4): 235–248. doi: 10.1016/j. ijmedinf.2014.01.004
Peine, A. & Neven, L. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technol¬ogy – A model and agenda. Ageing and Society 41(12): 2845–2866. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20000641
Peine, A., Rollwagen, I. & Neven, L. (2014). The rise of the “innosumer” – Rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82: 199–214. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013
Peine, A., van Cooten, V. & Neven, L. (2017). Rejuvenating de¬sign: Bikes, batteries, and older adopters in the diffusion of e-bikes. Science, Technology, & Human Values 42(3): 429–459. doi: 10.1177/0162243916664589
Peine, A., Marshall, B. L., Martin, W. & Neven, L. (Eds.) (2021). Socio-Geron¬technology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
Reisdorf, B. C. & Groselj, D. (2017). Internet (non-) use types and motiva¬tional access: Implications for digital inequalities research. New Media & Society 19(8): 1157–1176. doi: 10.1177/1461444815621539
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: University Press.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: SAGE Publications.
Stuiver, M. (2006). Highlighting the retro side of innovation and its potential for regime change in agriculture. In T. Marsden & J. Murdoch (eds.), Between the Local and the Global (pp. 147–173). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Survey of Health, Age and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). (2021). Questionnaire Wave 7. Available on http://www.share-project.org/ data-documentation/questionnaires/questionnaire-wave-7.htm¬l#c1240 (Accessed: February 15, 2022).
van Dyk, S., Lessenich, S., Denninger, T. & Richter, A. (2013). The many meanings of “Active Ageing”. Confronting public discourse with older people’s stories. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques 44(1). doi: 10.4000/rsa.932
Vatin, F. (2013). Valuation as evaluating and valorizing. Valuation Studies 1(1): 199–214. doi: 10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131131
Wanka, A. (2019). No time to waste – How the social practices of tem¬poral organisation change in the transition from work to retirement. Time & Society 29(2): 1–24. doi: 10.1177%2F0961463X19890985
Wanka, A. & Gallistl, V. (2018). Doing age in a digitized world – A material praxeology of aging with technology. Frontiers in Sociology 3: 6. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J. & Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The Meaning of “Aging in Place” to Older People, The Gerontologist, 52(3): 357–366. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr098