Main Article Content
The promise of technology to provide solutions to the global concern of ageing populations has largely been unfulfilled. We argue that this is, in part, related to design processes that fail to take account of the rich material lives of older people, and that often adopt stereotypical views of older people as frail, vulnerable and unskilled. We draw on empirical data from two co-design projects, to suggest the contributions that material gerontologists could make to design teams creating technologies for ageing populations. We suggest material gerontologists bring three key elements to interdisciplinary design teams: (1) making visible the intra-action of humans and non-humans in co-design processes; (2) reconfiguring co-design response-ably with older adults; and (3) reimagining possible outcomes of technology design. We believe that this approach can result in the design of products, services and innovations that respond better to the heterogeneous needs and life-worlds of older adults.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
Baker, S., Waycott, J., Carrasco, R., Hoang, T. & Vetere, F. (2019). Exploring the design of social VR experiences with older adults. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 303–315. doi: 10.1145/3322276.3322361
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke Uni¬versity Press.
Bischof, A. (2017). Soziale Maschinen Bauen: Epistemische Praktiken der Sozialrobotik. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Bjorgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. & Hilgreen, P. (2012). Agonistic participatory design: Working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8(2–3): 127–144. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2012.672577
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. London: Polity Press.
Bratteteig, T. & Wagner, I. (2016). Unpacking the notion of participation in Participatory Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25(6): 425–475. doi: 10.1007/s10606-016-9259-4
Braedley, S. (2019). Reinventing the nursing home: Metaphors that design care. In S. Katz (ed.), Ageing in Everyday Life: Materialities and Embodi¬ments (pp. 45–63). Bristol: Policy Press.
Buse, C., Martin, D. & Nettleton, S. (2018). Conceptualising “materialities of care”: Making visible mundane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociology of Health & Illness 40(2): 243–255. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12663
Cozza, M., Östlund, B. & Peine, A. (2021). When theory meets practice in entanglements of ageing and technology. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 11(2): 5–12.
Dörrenbächer, J. & Hassenzahl, M. (2019). Changing perspective: A co-design approach to explore future possibilities of divergent hearing. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300259
Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Endter, C. (2016). Scripting age – The negotiation of age and aging in ambient assisted living. In E. Domínguez-Rué & L. Nierling (eds.), Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences (pp. 121–140). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Endter, C. (2021). User participation as a matter of care. The configuration of older users in the design of assistive technologies. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 11(2): 93–116.
Gallistl, V. & Wanka, A. (2021). Connecting the Dots of New Materialist Approaches in the Study of Age (ing): The Landscape of Material Gerontology. Technoscienza Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies 11: 119–124.
Hallam, E. & Hockey, J. (2001). Death, Memory and Material Culture. London: Bloomsbury. in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
Höppner, G. (2015). “Becoming with things” in interviews: materialisierungsprozesse von wiener renter_innen am beispiel von berger¬zählungen. Body Politics 3: 213–234. Available online at: http://bodypolitics.de/de/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Heft_06_03_Ho-eppner_Interviews_End-1.pdf
Höppner, G. (2017). Embodying of the self during interviews: An agential realist account of the non-verbal embodying processes of elderly peo¬ple. Current Sociology 65(3): 356–375. doi: 10.1177/0011392115618515
Höppner, G. Y. & Urban, M. (2018). Where and how do aging processes take place in everyday life? Answers from a new materialist perspec¬tive. Frontiers in Sociology 3: 7. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00007
Jarke, J. (2021). Co-creating Digital Public Services for an Ageing Society: Evidence for User-centric Design. Springer: Open Access. Available on https:// link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-52873-7.pdf (Accessed: January 20, 2022).
Kania-Lundholm, M. (2019). Slow side of the divide?: Older ICT non- and seldom-users discussing social acceleration and social change. Digital Culture and Society 5(1): 85–104. doi: 10.14361/dcs-2019-0106
Katz, S. (2019a). Cultural Aging: Life Course, Lifestyle, and Senior Worlds. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Katz, S. (2019b). Introduction. In S. Katz (ed.), Ageing in Everyday Life: Materialities and Embodiments (pp. 1–21). Bristol: Policy Press.
Katz, S. & Marshall, B. (2018). Tracked and fit: Fitbits, brain games and the quantified aging body. Journal of Aging Studies 45: 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j. jaging.2018.01.009
Keady, J. D., Campbell, S., Clark, A., Dowlen, R., Elvish, R., Jones, L., Kindell, J., Swarbrick, C. & Williams, S. (2020). Re-thinking and re-positioning ‘being in the moment’ within a continuum of moments: Introducing a new conceptual framework for dementia studies. Ageing and Society 42(3): 681–702. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20001014
Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1989). Authoring lives. Journal of Folklore Research 26(2): 123–149.
Lee, J. J., Jaatinen, M., Salmi, A., Mattelmäki, T., Smeds, R. & Holopainen, M. (2018). Design choices framework for co-creation projects. Interna¬tional Journal of Design 12(2): 15–31.
Light, A., Leong, T. W. & Robertson, T. (2015). Ageing Well with CSCW, ECSCW’15. Available on https://dl.eusset.eu/bitstream/20.500.12015/3096/1/19%20LightLeongRobertson2015.pdf (Accessed: January 14, 2021).
Lindström, K. & Ståhl, Å. (2016). Becoming response-able stakeholders: Participatory design in times of uncertainties. Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops – Volume 2, pp. 41–44. doi: 10.1145/2948076.2948086
Manchester, H. (2018). Objects of loss: Resilience and continuity in material culture relationships. In A. Newman, D. Davenport & A. Goulding (eds.), Creative Practice in the Resilience of Older People (pp. 227–249). Connected Communities Series. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Manchester, H. (2021). Co-designing technologies for care: Spaces of co-habitation. In A. Peine, B. Marshall, L. Neven & W. Martin (eds.), Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Age and Technology (pp. 213–228). London: Routledge.
Manchester, H., Rumble, H. & Alive Activities. (2018). Parlours of Wonder: A Training Toolkit. University of Bristol and Alive Activities.
Manchester, H. & Stand + Stare. (2018). Parlours of Wonder: A Blueprint. Bristol, UK: University of Bristol and Stand + Stare.
Martin, A., Myers, N. & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 625–641. doi: 10.1177/ 0306312715602073
McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Mol, A. (2006). Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. London: Routledge.
Mol, A., Moser, I. & Pols. J. (2010). Care in Practice: On tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Neven, L. (2011). Representations of the Old and Ageing in the Design of the New and Emerging: Assessing the Design of Ambient Intelligence Technologies for Older People. Enschede: University of Twente.
Peine, A., Faulkner, A., Jaeger, B. & Moors, E. (2015). Science, technology and the “grand challenge” of ageing – Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.010
Peine, A. & Neven, L. (2020). The co-constitution of ageing and technology – A model and agenda. Ageing & Society 41(12): 2845–2866. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20000641
Pihkala, S. & Karasti, H. (2018). Politics of mattering in the practices of participatory design. Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial – Volume 2, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1145/3210604.3210616
Puig de La Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds (Vol. 41). Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rice, L. (2018). Nonhumans in participatory design. CoDesign 14(3): 238–257. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2017.1316409
Taylor, C. (2018). Each intra-action matters: Towards a posthuman ethics for enlarging response-ability in higher education pedagogic practice-ings. In R. Braidotti, V. Bozalek & T. Shefer (eds.), Zembylas Socially Just Pedagogies: Posthumanist, Feminist and Materialist Perspectives in Higher Education (pp. 81–96). London: Bloomsbury.
Twigg, J. (2004). The body, gender, and age: Feminist insights in social gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies 18(1): 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j. jaging.2003.09.001
Twigg, J. (2008). Clothing, aging and me – Routes to research. Journal of Aging Studies 22(2): 158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2007.12.010
Twigg, J. (2013). Fashion and Age: Dress, the Body and Later Life. London: Bloomsbury.
Twigg, J. (2021). Materiality and Age: The Case of Dress. British Society of Gerontology Conference Lancaster 2021. Online presentation.
Urban, M. (2017). “This really takes it out of you!” The senses and emotions in digital health practices of the elderly. Digital Health 3: 1–16. doi: 10.1177/2055207617701778
Urban, M. (2021). Topographies of ageing. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin & L. Neven (eds.), Socio-Gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology. (pp. 56–70). Routledge: London.
Vaisutis, K., Brereton, M., Robertson, T., Vetere, F., Durick, J., Nansen, B. & Buys, L. (2014). Invisible connections: Investigating older people’s emotions and social relations around objects 1. CHI ‘14: Proceed¬ings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1937–1940. doi: 10.1145/2556288.2557314
Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P. & Brittain, K. (2015). An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22(1): 1–27.
Wallace, J., Duncan, T., Lawson, S., Trueman, J., Montague, K., Carvalho, L., Groot, L., Craig, C., Fisher, H. & Koulidou, N. (2020). Design re¬search to support ongoingness. Bereavement Care 39(2): 88–92. doi: 10.1080/02682621.2020.1771969
Wanka, A. & Gallistl, V. (2018). Doing age in a digitized world – A material praxeology of aging with technology. Frontiers in Sociology 3: 6. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00006
Ward, R., Campbell, S. & Keady, J. (2016). “Gonna make yer gorgeous”: Everyday transformation, resistance and belonging in the care-based hair salon. Dementia 15(3): 395–413. doi: 10.1177/1471301216638969