On Age, Authenticity, and the Ageing Subject
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the relationship between selves as subject positions and the experience of aging. The existing psychological literature on “subjective” and “objective” age, it argues, has failed fully to engage with the idea of subjectivity, focusing instead upon what are ascribed and attributed identities. In contrast to treating age and ageing as some object-like characteristic potentially applicable to both things and persons, this inquiry explores the internal experience of ageing and whether such experience can realise an authentic subject position. In begins with an outline of De Beauvoir’s views of the “unrealisability” of such a subject position and proceeds to consider whether her views are the necessary consequence of the phenomenological existentialism of Sartre and Heidegger that frames her thesis. Such foreclosure on De Beauvoir’s part, I conclude, is not inevitable, and, ultimately, there is a choice between what may be termed a Sartrean or a De Beauvoir position on the possibility of realising an authentic subjectivity of age.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
Barnard, D. (2017). Aging as problem and mystery. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 60(4), 464–477. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2017.0036
Blattner, W. (2006). Heidegger’s being and time: A reader’s guide. Continuum Books.
Carman, T. (2000). Must we be inauthentic? In M. Wrathall & J. Malpas (eds.), Heidegger, Authenticity and Modernity: Essays in honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus (vol.1, pp.13–28). MIT Press.
Clayton, C. (2009). Beauvoir, Sartre, temporality, and the question of influence. Simone de Beauvoir Studies, 25, 50–62. doi: 10.1163/ 25897616-02501009
Crowell, S. G. (2005) Heidegger and Husserl: The matter and the method of philosophy. In H. L. Dreyfus & M. Wrathall (eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (pp. 49–64). Blackwell.
De Beauvoir, S. (1977). Old age (trans. P. O’Brian). Penguin Books.
De Beauvoir, S. (1979). All said and done (trans. P. O’Brian). Penguin Books.
De Beauvoir, S. (1984). Adieux (trans. P. O’Brian). Pantheon Books.
Descartes, R. (1998). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy (4th ed.) (trans. D. A. Cress). Hackett Publishing Co.
Deutscher, P. (2017). Afterlives: Beauvoir’s old age and in the intersections of the second sex. In L. Hengehold & N. Bauer (eds.), A companion to Simone de Beauvoir (1st ed., pp. 286–304). John Wiley & Sons.
Dolezal, L. (2012). Reconsidering the look in Sartre’s being and nothingness. Sartre Studies International, 18(1), 9–28. doi: 10.3167/ssi.2012.180102
Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Can there be a better source of meaning than every¬day practices? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II. In R. Polt (ed.), Heidegger’s being and time: Critical essays (pp. 141–154). Rowman & Littlefield.
Erikson, E. H. (1985). The life cycle completed: A review. W Norton & Co.
Foucault, M. (2002). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (vol. 3, pp. 326–348). Penguin Books.
Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. Routledge.
Guignon, C. (2005). Heidegger’s anti-dualism: Beyond mind and matter. In R. Polt (ed.), Heidegger’s being and time: Critical essays (pp. 75–87). Rowman and Littlefield.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time (trans. J. Stambaugh). State Univer¬sity of New York University Press.
Henschen, T. (2012). Dreyfus and Haugeland on Heidegger and authen¬ticity. Human Studies, 35, 95–113. doi: 10.1007/s10746-012-9212-6
Kastenbaum, R., Derbin, V., Sabatini, P. & Artt, S. (1972). “The ages of me”: Toward personal and interpersonal definitions of functional aging. Aging and Human Development, 3, 197–211. doi: 10.2190/ TUJR-WTXK-866Q-8QU7
Logan, J. R., Ward, R., & Spitze, G. (1992). As old as you feel: Age identity in middle and later life. Social Forces, 71(2), 451–467. doi: 10.2307/2580019
Mitova, V. (2012). Age and agency. Philosophical Papers, 41(3), 335–369. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2012.743214
Montepare, J. M. (2009). Subjective age: Toward a guiding lifespan frame¬work. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 42–46. doi: 10.1177/0165025408095551
Rancière, J. (1995). On the shores of politics. Verso.
Rubin, D. C., & Bernstein, D. (2006). People over forty feel 20% younger than their age: Subjective age across the lifespan. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 776–780. doi: 10.3758/BF03193996
Sartre, J-P. (2003). Being and Nothingness. Routledge.
Simons, M. A. (1981). Beauvoir and Sartre: The question of influence. Eros, 8(1), 25–42.
Simons, M. A. (2000). Beauvoir’s philosophical independence in a dia¬logue with Sartre. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 14(2), 87–103. doi: 10.1353/jsp.2000.0015
Small, H. (2007). The long life. Oxford University Press.
Stapleton, T. (2014). Dasein as being-in-the-world. In B. W. Davis (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Key concepts (pp. 44–56). Routledge.
Stoller, S. (2014). Simone De Beauvoir’s philosophy of age, gender, ethics, and time. De Gruyter.
Stroh, K. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity of Dasein in Heidegger’s Being and Time: How authenticity is a return to community. Human Studies, 38, 243–259. doi: 10.1007/s10746-015-9341-9
Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A developmental theory of positive aging. Springer Publishing.
Van der Heiden, G.-J., Novotný, K., Römer, I. & Tengelyi, L. (2012). Inves¬tigating subjectivity: Classical and new perspectives. Brill.
Wehrle, M. (2020). Being a body and having a body. The twofold tem¬porality of embodied intentionality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 499–521. doi: 10.1007/s11097-019-09610-z
Woodward, K. (2016). Rereading Simone De Beauvoir’s the coming of age. Age, Culture, Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3. doi: 10.7146/ ageculturehumanities.v3i.130161