Main Article Content
Developing ‘Age-Friendly Cities and Communities (AFCC)’ has become a key part of policies aimed at improving the quality of life of older people in urban areas. Despite this development, there is evidence of rising inequalities among urban elders, and little known about the potential and limitations of the age-friendly model to reduce old-age exclusion. This article addresses this research gap by comparing how Brussels, Dublin, and Manchester, as three members of the Global Network of AFCC, have responded to social exclusion in later life. The article combines data from document analysis and stakeholder interviews to examine: first, the age-friendly approach and the goal of reducing social exclusion; and second, barriers to developing age-friendly policies as a means of addressing exclusion. The paper suggests that there are reciprocal benefits in linking age-friendly and social exclusion agendas for producing new ways of combatting unequal experiences of ageing in cities.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 27–40.
Buffel, T., Handler, S. & Phillipson, C. (eds.) (2018) Age-Friendly Communities: A Global Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., De Donder, L., Dury, S., De Witte, N., Smetcoren, A. S. & Verté, D. (2014) Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 26: 52–72.
Buffel, T. & Phillipson, C. (2016) Can global cities be “age-friendly cities”? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55:94–100.
Buffel, T. & Phillipson, C. (2018) A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy30(2):173–192.
Corti, L., Witzel, A. & Bishop, L. (eds.) (2005). Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. Available on http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/13 (Accessed: November 30, 2019).
De Tavernier, W. & Aartsen, M. (2019). Old-age exclusion: Active ageing, ageism and agency. Social Inclusion 7(3): 1–3 doi: 10.17645/si.v7i3.2372.
Dublin Age Friendly City (2014). Dublin Age Friendly City Strategy 2014-2019. Dublin City Council. Available on http://www.dublincity.ie/sites/default/files/content/Community/AgeFriendlyCityProject/Doc-uments/DCCAgeFriendlyFAweb.pdf (Accessed: November 11, 2019).
Eurostat. (2017). Key figures on Europe. Luxembourg: Publications office of the EU.
Golant, S. M. (2014). Age-Friendly Communities: Are We Expecting Too Much? IRPP Insight 5. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Gonyea, J. G. & Hudson, R. B. (2015). Emerging models of age-friendly communities: A framework for understanding inclusion. Public Policy & Aging Report 25(1): 9–14.
Grenier, A. (2007). Constructions of frailty in the English language, care practice and the lived experience. Ageing & Society 27(3): 425–445.Hantrais, L. (2009). International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.Lehning, A. J., Smith, R. J. & Kyeongmo, K. (2017). “Friendly” initiatives: An emerging approach to improve communities for vulnerable populations. Journal of Policy Practice 16: 46–58.
Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E. & Patsios, D. (2007). The Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Social Exclusion. Bristol: University of Bristol.
McGarry, P. (2018). Developing age-friendly policies for cities: Strategies, challenges and reflections. In T. Buffel, S. Handler & C. Phillipson (eds.), Age-friendly Cities and Communities: A Global Perspective (pp. 231–250). Bristol: Policy Press.
Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G. & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging 30(3): 479–493.
McDonald, B., Scharf, T. & Walsh, K. (2018) Creating an age-friendly county in Ireland: Stakeholders’ perspectives on implementation. In T. Buffel, S. Handler, C. Phillipson (eds.), Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: A Global Perspective (pp. 143–166). Bristol: Policy Press.
Moulaert, T. & Garon, S. (eds.) (2016). Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison: Political lessons, Scientific Avenues, and Democratic Issues. Cham: Springer International.
Nazroo, J. (2017). Class and health inequality in later life: Patterns, mechanisms and implications for policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14: 1533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121533
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work 1: 261–283.
Phillipson, C. (2007). The “elected” and the “excluded”: Sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing & Society 27(3): 321–342.
Prattley, J., Buffel, T., Marshall, A. & Nazroo, J. (2020). Area effects on the level and development of social exclusion in later life. Social Science & Medicine 246: 112722.
Precupetu, L., Aartsen, M. & Vasile, M. (2019). Social exclusion and mental wellbeing in older Romanians. Social Inclusion 7(3):4–16. doi: 10.17645/si.v7i3.2008
Ramaswami, A., Russel, A. G., Culligan, P. J., Sharma, K. R. & Kumar, E. (2016). Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science 352(6288): 940–943.
Rémillard-Boilard, S. (2019). Developing Age-Friendly Cities: A Public Policy Perspective. Doctoral thesis. Manchester: The University of Manchester.
Rapley, T. (2013). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In U. Flick (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 49–63). London: Sage.
Ruggiano, N. & Perry, T. E. (2019). Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work 18(1): 81–97.
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C. & Smith, A. E. (2005). Social exclusion of older people in deprived urban communities of England, European Journal of Ageing 2(2): 76–78.
Scharf, T. & Shaw, C. (2017). Inequalities in Later Life. London: Centre for Ageing Better.
Scharlach, A. E. (2017). Aging in context: Individual and environmental pathways to aging-friendly communities. The Gerontologist 57(4): 606–618.
Scharlach, A. E. & Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing & Society 33(1): 110–136.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
Steels, S. (2015). Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review. Cities 47: 45–52.
UN-Habitat. (2016). World Cities. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
United Nations. (2019). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. New York: United Nations.
Van Regenmortel, S., De Donder, L., Dury, S., Smetcoren, A. S., De Witte, N. & Verté, D. (2016). Social exclusion in later life: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Population Ageing 9(4): 315–344.
Walsh, K. (2018). Evaluation of Phase 1 of the Dublin City Age Friendly Housing with Support Model in Inchicore. Dublin: The Housing Agency.
Walsh, K. (2015). Integrating the ‘age-friendly community’ in austerity: myths, realties and the influence of place context. In K. Walsh, G. Carney & A. Ni Leime (eds.), Ageing through Austerity: Critical Perspectives from Ireland. Bristol: Policy Press.
Walsh, K., Scharf, T. & Keating, N. (2017) Social exclusion of older persons: A scoping review and conceptual framework. European Journal of Ageing 14(1): 81–98.
Wanka, A., Moulaert, T. & Drilling, M. (2018). From environmental stress to spatial expulsion – Rethinking concepts of socio-spatial exclusion in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 12(2): 25–51.
White, S., Phillipson, C., Aftam, F. & Hammond, M. (2013). Old Moat: Age-Friendly Neighbourhood Report. Manchester: Southway Housing.
World Health Organization. (2007). Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2018). The Global Network for Age-Friendly Cit-ies and Communities: Looking back over the Last Decade, Looking Forward to the Next. Geneva: WHO.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.