Ageing in Inner Cities The Residential Dilemmas of the Baby Boomer Generation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although residential mobility decreases with age, rates rise around the age of retirement, especially for people living in cities. The post-war birth cohort of 1945–1954 differs in many respects from previous generations, and these differences are currently influencing residential choices made around the age of retirement. Using data from 60 semi-structured interviews in four areas of London and Paris that have undergone gentrification, this paper examines the residential trajectories and choices facing members of the 1945–1954 birth cohort. The analysis reveals three types of residential trajectories – ’pioneers of gentrification’, ’city movers’ and ’local inhabitants’. These trajectories are intertwined with contextual factors such as life course events, family situation, housing market conditions, and the institutions of Britain and France. The analysis shows that pioneers of gentrification have more opportunities for choice in future residential locations, and are tending to adopt complex residential patterns that often involve a combination of extended stays throughout the year in different locations. Whilst they still favour a city life, their current neighbourhood location is not a priority in any future residential choice. City movers have lived in diverse locations over the life course and although they too express a continued preference for the city, ties to the local neighbourhood remain relatively weak. Among the ’local’ inhabitants, differentiation from the gentrifers is strong, and attachment to the local neighbourhood depends upon the context of the urban setting. The British and French contexts of housing policy and markets play an important role in determining residential mobility. Collectively, the analysis shows that there is little ’stability’ in the choices for current cohorts of people in cities approaching retirement, with few interviewees having formed a definitive plan for a future residential location.
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
References
Bonnin, P. & Villanova, R. (eds.) (1999). D’une maison l’autre. Paris: Créaphis.
Bonvalet, C. (2007). Vieillissement de la population et logement: les stratégies résidentielles et patrimoniales. In C. Bonvalet, F. Drosso, F. Benguigui & M. Huynh (eds.), Vieillissement de la population et logement. Les stratégies résidentielles et patrimoniales. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Bonvalet, C. & Merlin, P. (eds.) (1988). Les transformations de la famille. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Bonvalet, C., Gotman, A. & Grafmeyer, Y. (eds.) (2007). Family Kinship and Place in France. London: Southern Universities Press.
Butler, T. (1997). Gentrification and the Middle Classes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Butler, T. (2006). Gentrification and Globalization: the emergence of a middle range theory?
http://www.portedeurope.org/IMG/pdf/cahier_ville014.pdf (Last accessed November 18, 2007).
Butler, T. & Robson, G. (2001). ‘Social capital, gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: a comparison of three south London neighbourhoods’. Urban Studies 38(12): 2145–2162. [Read this article]
Butler, T. & Robson, G. (2003). London Calling: the Middle Classes and the Remaking of Inner London. Oxford: Berg.
Champion, T. (2005). Migration and British Cities. London: The Treasury. http://eprints.ncl.ac.uk/file_store/nclep_421141728076.pdf.
Christel, V. (2006). Trajectoires résidentielles des personnes âgées. Données sociales – La société française. Paris : INSEE.
Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification – a political challenge. In R. Atkinson & G. Bridge, Gentrification in a Global Context: the New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge.
Cribier, F. (1988). Le logement à l’heure de la retraite: l’exemple des Parisiens. In C. Bonvalet & P. Merlin (eds.), Transformation de la Famille et Habitat, INED, DREIF, IDEF, Travaux et Documents, 120, Paris.
Dench, G., Gavron, K. & Young, M. (2006). The New East End: Kinship, Race and Conflict. London: Profile Books.
Ermisch, J. F. & Jenkins, S. P. (1999). Retirement and housing adjustment in later life: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Labour Economics, 6(2): 311–333. [Read this article]
Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. Centre for Urban Studies. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Gotman, A. (1989). Familles, générations, patrimoine : une question urbaine. In Les annales de la Recherche Urbaine, 41.
Hamnett, C. (2003). Gentrification and the middle class remaking of inner London, 1961–2001. Urban Studies 40(12): 2401–26. [Read this article]
Harkin, J. & Huber, J. (2004). Eternal Youths: How the Baby Boomers are having their Time Again. London: Demos.
Lelièvre, E. & Bonvalet, C. (1994). A compared cohort history of residential mobility, social change, and home-ownership in Paris and the rest of France, Urban Studies 31: 1647–1665. [Read this article]
Ley, D. (1996). The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loiseau, M. & Bonvalet, C. (2005). The impact of the 1948 housing law on residential trajectories in the Paris region. Population-E 60(3): 301–316.
Longino Jr., C.F. (2001). Geographical distribution and migration. In R. Binstock & L. George (eds.), Handbook on Aging and the Social Sciences, 5th Edition. New York: Academic Press.
Louchart, P. (2007). Où vieilliront les générations du baby-boom? In C. Bonvalet, F. Drosso, F. Benguigui & M. Huynh (eds.), Vieillissement de la population et logement. Les stratégies résidentielles et patrimoniales. Paris: La Documentation Française.
Phillipson, C. (2007). The ‘elected’ and the ‘excluded’: sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing and Society 27(3): 321–342. [Read this article]
Phillipson, C., Bernard, M., Phillips, J. & Ogg, J. (2001). The Family and Community Life of Older People : Social Networks and Social Support in Three Urban Areas. London: Routledge.
Pinçon, M. & Pinçon-Charlot, M. (2004). Sociologie de Paris. Paris, La Découverte.
Rothenberg Pack, J. (1973). Determinants of migration to central cities. Journal of Regional Science 13(2): 249–260. [Read this article]
Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and Belonging. London: Sage.
Scharf, T., Phillipson, C., Kingston, P. & Smith, A.E. (2001). Social exclusion and older people: exploring the connections. Education and Ageing 163: 303–320.
Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
Tatsiramos, K. (2006). Residential mobility and the Housing adjustment of the elderly in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper, no. 2435.
Urry, J. (2001). Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
Warnes, A.M. (1992). Migration and the life course. In T. Champion & T. Fielding (eds.), Migration Processes and Patterns. London: Belhaven Press.