Main Article Content
Comparing data from a contemporary (2002) study and a study from 1984, it was found that, now as then, people display seemingly contradictory constellations of attitudes toward old people. Large proportions of respondents, now as then, advocate more influence and space for the 65+ group, at the same time as many feel that no one in the parliament should be above the age of 65. This contradiction becomes intelligible when the conceptions of and behavioral dispositions toward old people are combined in a new proposed typology of ageism, which is the result of a study conducted in 2002 and reported in this article. This new typology includes the Pitying Positive, the No Fuzz, the Consistently Negative and the Consistently Positive. These types are empirically described, and use of the typology is exemplified by focusing on ageist attitudes toward parliament membership.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Since 2020 the International Journal of Ageing and Later Life uses a Creative Commons: Attribution license, which allows users to distribute the work and to reform or build upon it without the author's permission. Full reference to the author must be given.
AnswerTree 1.0 User’s Guide. (1998). SPSS Inc. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Butler, R. N. (1969). Ageism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist 9: 243–246.
Butler, R. N. (2001). Ageism. In G. L. Maddox (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Aging. A Comprehensive Resource in Gerontology and Geriatrics. Third Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Galtung, J. (1969). Theory and Methods of Social Research. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Green, B. F. (1954). Attitude Measurement. In G.W Allport, G. Lindzey (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, I. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, Cop.
Kalish, R. A. (1979). The New ageism and the failure models: A polemic, The Gerontologist 19(4): 398–402.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/19.4.398
Kretch, D. & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes, Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163–204. [Read this article]DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266945
Kass, G. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large qantities of categorical data, Applied Statistics 29: 119–127. [Read this article]DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296
Kite, M. E. & Smith Wagner, L. (2004). Attitudes toward older adults In T.D. Nelson (ed.) Ageism. Stereotyping and Prejudice against Older Persons, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Lundgren, N. (2005). Moderaterna är åldersfascister [The Conservatives are age-fascists]. Aftonbladet, April 11, 2005.
Ofstad, H. (1972). Vårt förakt för svaghet: Nazismens normer och värderingar – och våra egna. Stockholm: Prisma. (In English 1989: Our Contempt for Weakness. Nazi Norms and Values – and Our Own. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.)
Palmore, E. B. (1977). Facts on aging. A short quiz, The Gerontologist 17(4): 315–320.
Palmore, E. B. (1999). Ageism: Negative and Positive. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Pensionär -75, (1977) [The Retirement Investigation], SOU 1977:98, Stockholm: Liber.
Thurstone, L. L. & Chave, E. J. (1929). The Measurement of Attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tornstam, L. (1984). Sociala attityder till äldre [Social Attitudes Toward the Elderly], Work report No. 19 from the project “Elderly in Society – Past, Present and in the Future”, Uppsala: Dept. Of Sociology.
Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence. A Developmental Theory of Positive Aging, New York: Springer Publishing Company.